Remember, Remember, the 11th September:
Thermite, Treason and Plot
by T.M. Duncan, 2007
Part 1: What is Not True
On September 11th 2001, four American Airlines flights detoured from their flight path. Two of these flights (UAF175, UAF11) struck each of the twin towers at the World Trade Center complex in New York city. The towers collapsed leaving nothing but a pile of rubble. It is agreed that 2,974 people needlessly lost their lives that day and that over 1.3 million people have lost their lives since in the oxymoronic ‘war on terror’. Time has shown that this was a war of terror.
This is true. This is all that is true. But, it is not what is true that counts here, it is what is not true.
We were told that UAF Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.
This is not true.
We were told that UAF Flight 93 completely disintegrated in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
This is not true.
We were told the flights were hijacked by Islamic extremists.
This is not true.
We were told these attacks were planned by the elusive Osama Bin Laden and the similarly elusive al-Qaeda terrorist network.
This is not true.
We were told the towers collapsed because the intense heat created by the jet fuel caused the load-bearing steel beams to ’sag’ and eventually ‘fail’ – the ‘pancake’ theory.
This is not true. (This is actually impossible.)
The ‘official’ narrative is not true. As far as absolute truth goes, the real narrative is still unknown and 9/11 is still an unsolved mystery. The event should not be categorised as a ‘terrorist suicide attack’, it should be categorised as an ‘unresolved incident’, or, as some argue, as an act of treason against the American public. There is no substantial evidence to justify the claims that this incident was caused by Islamic ‘terrorists’. Nothing other than sketchy videotape and flawed intelligence that has yet to be disclosed.
This reductive concept has been mythologised by the corporate media throughout the world and this ‘official’ narrative has been authorised – with our consent – and substituted for truth, whilst reality has been reconstituted as untruth.
Fiction has been mistaken for fact. Fantasy has authenticated reality.
However, alternatively, in opposition to the ‘official’ narrative, we now have an entire movement, empowered by the internet, developed on an international scale, that has faced the realm of untruth in an attempt to extract reality. They are called truth seekers, conspiracy theorists, independent researchers, or worse, particularly in certain academic circles, pseudo-scientists, even sub-intellectuals. In reality, we are these people, you and I: the journalist, the scientist, the doctor, the school teacher, the engineer, even the occasional Professor. In reality, these people are symptomatic of the widespread resistance to the official 9/11 narrative because the ‘official’ narrative is not true. Any intelligent mind should be offended that this was even offered as truth.
When so much is not true, when so many tell untruths, how do we then distinguish what is in fact true? Or is it that the ‘truth’ is unreachable, beyond our grasp? Yet grasp we must, even if our fingers get burned in the process. Grasp we must.
So, do we take the position of government organisations, intelligence agencies and the corporate media, all of whom have disgraceful track records, all of whom have lied? Or, do we take the position of academics, scientists and engineers, all of whom have proven track records, all of whom have not lied?
When laid out as such, the right choice becomes all too apparent. Who would you believe: the salesman or the wise-man?
It’s time to stop listening to the salesman and time to pay heed to the wise-man. A simple choice.
As for the truth: that’s for you to discover. As for this truth: that’s still to be told.
Hope can be found HERE.
